Cold weather, first frosts and football: why not all turf is the same

Posted on 28 November 2025

Across much of Europe the first meaningful frosts of the season have arrived just as the football calendar moves into a critical period of league fixtures and heavy training loads. At this time of year, having surfaces that stay safe and playable in all conditions is essential for equity and access to the game. However, turf is not one single material, and different systems respond very differently to cold and wet weather.

Polymer based systems and stability in the cold

Traditional rubber filled systems use SBR performance infill combined with typically PE fibres. Both are hydrophobic polymers with very low glass transition temperatures, well below -40°C. This means they remain flexible and elastic at typical winter field temperatures. The rubber granules continue to move and deform under load, maintaining shock absorption, traction, etc.… even when air and surface temperatures drop below freezing.

PurePT, a fibre based and non-filled system, behaves in a similar way. Its structure is defined by densely packed fibres. The polymer remains elastic and does not bind water, so the surface response stays the same when hot or cold.

Mineral infill systems and when sand starts to lock

Sand or mineral infilled systems behave very differently. The infill is made up of hard, angular mineral particles with pore spaces that retain moisture between the grains. As temperature falls and the surface becomes cold and wet, several things happen at the same time:

Water between sand grains becomes more viscous and then begins to freeze
Thin water or ice films and capillary bridges form between particles, which increases inter particle cohesion and friction
The sand changes from a free-flowing granular material into a much stiffer, partially locked matrix (this is how we make sandcastles!)

The result is a surface that deforms less under load and absorbs less impact. In practical terms, mineral infill systems which sit comfortably inside preferred norms at warm temperatures can quickly move outside the safe or preferred ranges as they become cold. Surface hardness increases, shock absorption is reduced and the traction or grip significantly drops.

Polymer biased systems, in contrast, remain within target windows over the same temperature change because their elastic response is not governed by changing conditions.

Change in SA (%) with temperature

In the graphs this is very clear. From 23°C down to 3°C the performance curve for the sand or mineral system drops away from the green (FIFA) range of preferred values from both grip and shock absorption, while rubber filled and Pure PT systems remain stable.

This is a useful reminder that if we care about equal access to safe football throughout the cold winter months, we must design and test our surfaces for real world conditions.

Grass & Turf: Approach to Maximising Playability

The video below demonstrates the difference in how grass and turf respond to intensive use, simulating the equivalent of 8 full matches over a typical weekend (4 on Saturday, 4 on Sunday). While the grass surface visibly degrades and becomes increasingly unplayable, the turf retains its performance characteristics throughout, showing no meaningful change in playability. This is not a criticism of grass. Rather, it highlights the growing need for a more flexible, resilient…

Recoil and Foot Stability: A Critical Difference

Foot stability is fundamental to athlete performance, yet it is often overlooked in surface design. One of the key contributors to instability is recoil. Natural grass provides exceptional foot stability with minimal recoil. The surface allows athletes to plant, pivot, and push off with confidence and control. This stability is not accidental. It is the result of a surface that absorbs impact in a controlled way without returning disruptive energy back…

The Rooster Tail! Spray of black rubber.

It may look dramatic in slow motion replays, a spray of black rubber erupting behind a tackle or a hard hit ball. But the “rooster tail” is not something we want to see from a well designed turf system. When there is too much infill in the turf system, the material becomes highly mobile. That leads to: Inconsistencies across the field as infill migrates from one area to another Uneven playing…

Which shockpad gives the highest ball bounce?

A simple question that reveals a surprisingly complex reality beneath the turf. Ball behaviour on hockey surfaces is far from linear. To demonstrate this, we tested three systems: 1️⃣ A rigid concrete laboratory floor 2️⃣ A 15 mm in situ rubber e-layer 3️⃣ A 10 mm closed-cell PE foam pad Most assume the rigid floor will always produce the highest bounce. Yet when tested across a range of drop heights, the…

Impact testing for sports surfaces: what they tell us (and what they don’t)

When we talk about “how a surface feels” or “how safe it is,” we are really talking about impact mechanics. How energy is absorbed, transmitted, and returned when the body meets the surface. In practice, the sports surface industry relies on three main tiers of tests. Each provides useful information, but each answers a different question. Direct impact and compaction tools such as the Clegg hammer These are simple portable devices…

Grip, Traction, & Cleat Release

In our latest round of player testing, we’ve taken a deep dive into the biomechanics of cleat release, often simply thought of as grip or friction, between the athlete and the surface. Using a suite of high-end sensors, IMUs, and high-speed video analysis, we’ve measured cleat release down to the millimeter. We worked with a diverse group of players (N = 300); male and female, elite and amateur, and tested under…

Colin Young

16 posts

For more than 25 years, I have dedicated my career to researching and advancing playing surfaces for sport, play, and leisure. My journey began at Loughborough University, where I was awarded a PhD. I then moved on to testing and certification at Labosport before joining TenCate as Global Director of Research & Development. I am driven by a passion to improve user performance, experience, and safety while championing sustainability. By innovating next-generation surfaces that benefit both players and the environment, I aim to shape the future of surface technology.